The Simulator That Could Supercharge Robotics!

❀️ Check out Weights & Biases and sign up for a free demo here:

πŸ“ The paper is available here:

πŸ“ My paper on simulations that look almost like reality is available for free here:

Or this is the orig. Nature Physics link with clickable citations:

πŸ™ We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:
Alex Balfanz, Alex Haro, B Shang, Benji Rabhan, Gaston Ingaramo, Gordon Child, John Le, Juan Benet, Kyle Davis, Loyal Alchemist, Lukas Biewald, Martin, Michael Albrecht, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Taras Bobrovytsky,, Thomas Krcmar, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi.
If you wish to appear here or pick up other perks, click here:

My research:
X/Twitter:
Thumbnail design: FelΓ­cia Zsolnai-FehΓ©r –

Joe Lilli
 

  • @BigSources says:

    Robots should be trained in mma gyms. That way we can have robots that have great control over their body and can even join the police force because of that. Also that way we can even recreate that one movie with will smith.

  • @AlgoNudger says:

    So much hype! πŸ˜‚

  • @frontier884 says:

    Just get me a robot who can fold all this damn laundry πŸ˜‚

  • @1523paul says:

    Can this also train the cobots in restaurant ?

  • @Utmanarn says:

    This is very cool for the future of robotics! What a time to be alive!

  • @mihirvd01 says:

    WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE !!!

  • @SashkaPosik says:

    Can’t simulate down to atom so it will not prove itself to be sustainable and feasible in time.
    “Subjective generalization through filtering generated hallucinations of concepts in related subjects” (whatever that will be named in the future) is the best way to train any AI, human brain generalizes the same way, just need more compute and optimization to get there and will eventually do.

    • @dinhero21 says:

      so, make AIs imagine? getting the training data would be extremely hard though (since you’d have to do it IRL)

    • @shirowolff9147 says:

      Theres no human on earth who can copy others on an atomic level, but you can still do things and it works, so they dont need to mimic reality 100%

    • @cherubin7th says:

      This is called World Model, Smidhuber made a paper about that with a student.

  • @grabthatauto5 says:

    4:45 that joke caught me off guard lmao. Love your content keep it up

  • @M4rt1nX says:

    What a time to be alive and witness all this advancements.

  • @rindernetz1061 says:

    What a time to still have permission from our AI masters to be alive!

  • @TonyVallad says:

    Be careful, cats will invent a robot to pet and feed them and they’ll start replacing us.
    We’ll be obsolete and cats won’t need us anymore!
    AI is dangerous indeed, but it’s the cats we should be worried about πŸ˜‚

  • @carvalhoribeiro says:

    Absolutely incredible. So important process innovation. Thanks for sharing this.

  • @swine13 says:

    I would just like to point out that I, according to all relevant regional legal requirements, have proven myself to be a safe driver consistently and in a multitude of simulated scenarios.

    I also still mount the kerb on occasion, and my car’s exterior is home to more than a handful of “not quite insignificant” dents and scratches.

    Make of that information what you will…

  • @Julzaa says:

    Again with this “robots in simulations” topic??

  • @stocane5628 says:

    I’m sure these robots will be used for folding laundry and nothing destructive…

  • @garywhite2050 says:

    Mightily!

  • @baz5572 says:

    With all the accidents I see on automated vehicles a normal driver could easily interpret I believe we need a connected system all around with multiple sensors, just one type is not sufficient.

  • @yelowpunk says:

    The Increasingly Inaccurately Named Two Minute Papers channel gives Douglas Adams vibes.

  • @tjn0110 says:

    Out of an abundance of caution, I proactively held onto my papers before starting this video.

  • >