OpenAI’s New AI: Being Smart Is Overrated!

❤️ Check out Weights & Biases and sign up for a free demo here:

📝 The paper "Prover-Verifier Games improve legibility of LLM outputs" is available here:

📝My neural rendering / Material synthesis paper (Gaussian Material Synthesis):

📝 My paper on simulations that look almost like reality is available for free here:

Or this is the orig. Nature Physics link with clickable citations:

🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:
Alex Balfanz, Alex Haro, B Shang, Benji Rabhan, Gaston Ingaramo, Gordon Child, John Le, Kyle Davis, Loyal Alchemist, Lukas Biewald, Martin, Michael Albrecht, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Taras Bobrovytsky, Ted Johnson, Thomas Krcmar, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi.
If you wish to appear here or pick up other perks, click here:

My research:
X/Twitter:
Thumbnail design: Felícia Zsolnai-Fehér –

#openai #chatgpt

Joe Lilli
 

  • @juliandarley says:

    fascinating paper. has implications for epistemology and moral problems that society is increasingly going to face because of the increase in AI and robots, but also because of the worsening climate and environment situation. two things i would love to be able to improve which this paper may help with: coding (AI still not good at many real-world coding problems) and verification of facts, especially medical facts, where lives are on the line.

  • @akosizrake says:

    what a time to be not first

  • @blidea9191 says:

    What a time to be alive!

  • @tekosin0 says:

    interesting

  • @Oscaragious says:

    Makes sense. It’s easier to verify than to prove.

  • @zteaxon7787 says:

    Now for them to lift the “I can’t talk about that” political blockages and we’re getting somewhere

    • @jeromyperez5532 says:

      Yeah the social guardrails are pretty lame. Especially given that what’s politically correct now will be outdated and offensive in 10 years.

  • @user-dw5ch6ux3u says:

    4:35 i don’t get it

    i would argue is terrible for 99% of people. you are choosing to handicap your model so it can speak a bit clearer but what’s the point? in the rare cases where an ai chatbot spits out something very complex you can just literally ask it to dumb it down and it just does. not to mention that i nor anyone else i know have never felt like an output from a chatbot was too profound for me to figure out what it said(it’s not that i am super smart, chatbots just produce very understandable outputs)

    1:55 think to yourself, do we really need to specially train the ai for such a usecase? what’s wrong with having it use powers? if you are confused you can then ask it to clarify.

    am i missing something?

  • @samhale5413 says:

    A grade school student is usually required to show their work.
    A PHD student is required to defend their thesis.
    Why not force AI to explain as well?

  • @Happy-vz3xe says:

    What a time to be alive

  • @CraftyChaos23 says:

    Isn’t this architecture same as GAN?

  • @user-ei5ll9pl7p says:

    Hello random person on the internet 👋

  • @Happy-vz3xe says:

    Man I love u 2 minutes paper u are god for curious students like me

  • @nowymail says:

    The generated Einsten and the kid’s pictures are creepy. Look so bad and artificial. The Internet is full of generated pictures now. I am sick of them already!

  • @xray718 says:

    ELI5 for AI

  • @jeronimocliff2972 says:

    Thank you for the quick heads-up !

  • @Mad3011 says:

    What time to be AI

  • @kevinoudelet says:

    Wadtba!

  • >