OpenAI o1: ChatGPT Supercharged!
❤️ Check out Lambda here and sign up for their GPU Cloud:
📝OpenAI o1 preview:
📝 Link to our Material Synthesis paper:
📝 My paper on simulations that look almost like reality is available for free here:
Or this is the orig. Nature Physics link with clickable citations:
🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:
Alex Balfanz, Alex Haro, B Shang, Benji Rabhan, Gaston Ingaramo, Gordon Child, John Le, Juan Benet, Kyle Davis, Loyal Alchemist, Lukas Biewald, Martin, Michael Albrecht, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Taras Bobrovytsky, Ted Johnson, Thomas Krcmar, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi.
If you wish to appear here or pick up other perks, click here:
My research:
X/Twitter:
Thumbnail design: Felícia Zsolnai-Fehér –
#openai #o1
This is huge; I wouldn’t think this could happen so soon!
And remember the first law of papers, two more papers down the line 👀
Spoken like a True Fellow Scholar!
But unfortunately there were no real papers that got published about this model :(. Maybe the Q* paper is what one could salvage?
Nope, this is all hype at best. This is only a tree of hidden prompts, You can probably get the same quality of result using vanilla gpt 4o by iterating your prompts manually this just do it automatically. Also I bet this will consume a magnitude more compute, more like a brute force approach to a prompt not efficient at all. I doubt they can scale this one without charging ridiculous amount. Just imagine paying 20 bucks for a single prompt not knowing if the llm will achieve your goal or fail or need to add more money.
Going to need some help holding on to my papers with this one, this is cool!
what a time to be alive!
Well the bible is a source of a lot of misinformation, so perhaps they cleaned it from the knowledge base..?
Very impressive! Can’t imagine what this will become in a year
@@kevinwoodrobotics just tow papers down the line…
What an awesome time to be alive in the real world of AIs
The Singularity is certainly nearer
Exactly, there are 3 r’s in strawberry
The improvements to AI are coming faster and faster, I think we’re past the singularity, were on the up sloap
@@OpreanMircea The singularity is when the AIs self improve completely autonomously. All of these advancements are the result of significant human effort (possibly with AI assistance at this point, but still with significant human input). The singularity will probably happen in most of our lifetimes, but we aren’t there yet.
@@AustinThomasPhD that’s not the definition, it’s the “point of inflection”, where the curve measuring something (in this case AI development) stops going one way (slowing down) and it starts accelerating, is it using the AI or people to do that? It doesn’t matter, line go up faster and faster
@@OpreanMircea No, Austin is right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity BTW exponential growth curves don’t have a point of inflection.
The smartest people out there just got an upgrade.
No, they were made obsolete.
@@evokanivo If you think that this is making someone obsolete, perhaps you will be obsolete very soon. Better learn how to use AI before AI learn how to use you!
@@evokanivohow so? Who can validate that the AI is doing its work correctly other than subject matter experts? Other AI can’t be used since it runs into the same problem, who is reviewing their work etc
Everyone else kind of just ignores it because we can’t think of anything useful to ask it.
After 7.5 million years of thinking.The answer is 42.
It is always 42.
Best comment!
But what is the question?
@@glenneric1 How many roads one must travel down.
4.9 is the best number for u nemployment say the 8ank of €ngland maybe 42 Trillion is the optimal debt 😊
“Do you want to work with someone that read all the books but can never apply that knowledge?” Wow. You didn’t have to call me out like that.
Oooooh. So about a week ago I got the usual response1/response2 “which is better” when using GPT 4o, except this time there was a disclaimer saying “you are testing a new model which takes more time to think, please be patient while the response loads” and I guess this was the new model they were alpha testing to premium users? Pretty cool if you ask me
And yes, I did notice one of the results was significantly better so I assume it was this o1 model, and the other was standard 4o response. What a time to be alive!
I got that yesterday and the day before, and I am in the free tier, so I guess they are testing with everyone.
That’s insane level of missing the chance to name your AI model “o7”
o7 will be the model that powers military humanoid robots lol
Q1 is actually much better name .. Q symbolize questioning and reason.
I always thought that GPT knew too much for having such a small brain.
This is a total notch up. What a time to be alive!
First things first, we should ask it to prove the Riemann Hypothesis.
To test it out I played tic tac toe against it, GPT-4o was constantly losing and made illogical moves, now against o1-preview, I haven’t won yet.
Not even a draw?
@@jimbodimbo981 Always draw I meant. No lose
@@jimbodimbo981that’s not what he said.
in a box!
@@jimbodimbo981 I meant I always draw against it, but it hasn’t lost yet.
Back in my days we had only two ‘r’s in a word ‘strawberry’
The “There are 3 Rs in strawberry” freakin’ got me
Tried today with coding a Unreal engine 5 plugin. This version is finally able to grab the context and maintain the focus without just repeating the same mistakes.🎉
Are the limits for 30 prompts a week still there? Just curious. As I was using it I didn’t notice any limits, but they won’t mention them until you hit them?
Yup, still there, maybe in a few months, but u can use it via the api, but you need to be tier 5 @phen-themoogle7651
Cool thanks now you’re fired
@@_capugood thing I’m an indie dev so it’s basically like I hired a free developer to build my dream
@@_capu who said i need a job ;–)
Reasoning is the key. They are on the right path.
Tried the new model. I gave it instruction to write paragraph on some set of constraints. with slower thinking, it actually results in better response. What a time to be alive!
Hold onto what paper this time? Is OpenAI even bothering publishing a paper this time? 🤨
The potential of o1 to excel in fields like genetics and quantum physics is truly groundbreaking. The future of AI-assisted research looks incredibly promising!
I was playing around with this and was able to generate a clone of Atari’s classic “Centipede” via HTML and Javascript in a single prompt.
That said, I did need to run through about 30 more iterations to get it where I was satisfied with the gameplay, the initial version was functional, but somewhat one-dimensional in terms of gameplay.
I just used Emojis instead of generating any sprite sheets (works well enough for a game like this), and used Suno to generate a 4-bit synth audio loop for background music.
Overall, I could have written this game by hand in about 2 hours.
The time spent with ChatGPT was actually about 3 hours, lol. But, ChatGPT allowed me to go through many more iterations and experiment with features much more quickly, without compromising on the quality. So for the time spent, I think I came out with a much more polished game than if I had manually coded it in the same amount of time.
I would also add, if Using ChatGPT was a natural part of my coding workflow, it would likely be much, much faster. Most of my time was spent tinkering and pushing some very difficult prompts on it. If I had a planned project instead of something impromptu, I could have phrased my prompts much better to cut the time dramatically.
And o1-Preview doesn’t take files as input yet, so that was also another bottleneck that I imagine will be resolved soon.
I look forward to trying some other projects, but I have exceeded my weekly allowance, lol.