OpenAI’s ChatGPT Does Research… And Breaks Itself!
❤️ Check out Lambda here and sign up for their GPU Cloud:
📝 The AI scientist is available here:
Terence Tao Interview:
📝 My paper on simulations that look almost like reality is available for free here:
Or this is the orig. Nature Physics link with clickable citations:
🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:
Alex Balfanz, Alex Haro, B Shang, Benji Rabhan, Gaston Ingaramo, Gordon Child, John Le, Kyle Davis, Loyal Alchemist, Lukas Biewald, Martin, Michael Albrecht, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Taras Bobrovytsky, Ted Johnson, Thomas Krcmar, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi.
If you wish to appear here or pick up other perks, click here:
My research:
X/Twitter:
Thumbnail design: Felícia Zsolnai-Fehér –
Will have to tell AI to hold onto my papers
Hold on to _its_ papers.
😂
You are a scientist specializing in holding papers…
Another banger of Two Minute Papers!
Whoa I’m pinned btw Two Minute Papers did you see I tweeted to you check JCtechfuture see what ya think 🤖
Next word prediction -> Next paper prediction?
Not possible. You need induction and deduction abilities, which LLMs don’t have.
* not yet. Soon.
This is actually really problematic for research since all these papers will need to be reviewed and an influx of AI papers are likely to break our current review system.. (which is likely to happen)
then an AI for review gets born and we are stuck in a loop
more papers = more reviewers = more jobs
The review system is already broken
@@Lagger130 We then have a GAN like structure for papers? 😀
This already happened years ago, but from academic / journal corruption rather than AI. AI may exacerbate the issue, but it could also be used to help with it, so /shrug
Research by Grok et al. 🤣
I love how you’ve said top tier research scientists, brought up a pic of Edward Witten, and in a video just released by Sabine, she posted a pic of him when she was saying scientists don’t always contribute much to society, lol
I want to get notifications coming from this thread
it is becase he goes with the string theory?
@@alexiscontreras5699The same string theory that has produced no real world results in 70 years, yes.
@@aleksjenner677 “produced no ‘real world’ results”
good thing einstein didn’t heed the warning of “pursue nothing that may not immediately reveal something tangible about our universe” and, you know, actually happened on a more accurate model of everything. that’s kinda what theoretical physics is about.
I want notifs toooo, this debate is going to be interesting.
What a time to be alive!
2:20 Saying $10 per paper seems optimistic when the other three models cost at least an order of magnitude more.
EDIT: I read the column wrong. That is the TOTAL cost. The range seems to be $20 to 30 cents per paper.
Was it not for ALL Research? And they put out multiple papers.
@@ThomasTomiczek My bad, you’re right. The range seems to be $20 to 30 cents.
Waiting for the time we get 6 billion manuscripts per second to a journal, while ai driven editors decline 99.9999% of those in milliseconds including totally human written ones😅
Those will probably be the lowest quality.
When papers will be actually judged on the quality of their contributions and not based on the NAME IN THE TITLE?
Blasphemy!
Okay but… people won’t read papers they’ll just ask a chatbot to give them the answers instead. The capability to churn out papers at such a pace means the papers most likely not be read. Who is the paper for if no one will read it? I assume it will be for future generative text algorithms.
It just seems like everything on the internet will become more and more saturated with complete garbage, and one will have to be a specialist or have decent connections with real people to find anything of value in a homogeneous sea of trash.
AI writing text for AI… Sounds plausible!
@@kittengray9232 yes, this is the only logical scenario here. And it may lead to an different format of “papers” that would be more efficient to use for AI.
Do you do any kind od research? What do you mean tell an LLM to give me the answers?
You still have to read.
I can use an LLM to find the information within the paper and connections and outside data… it cant read for me and make the decisions and functions I am looking for.
Papers are read. I do not understand how will I learn a mechanism I am looking to learn more about if not by reading even if that is by analysis, outline or search functions from NLPs.
It’s already happening on YouTube with a sea of AI generated trash
Time to improve my firm handshaking skill
3:18 You know AI learned to research when they ask for a deadline extension and increase in budget.
When you say that the there will be a leap in progress in the next paper, it’ll just be a case of clicking re-run and waiting a couple of minutes.
Two more papers down the line
inb4 singularity starts with a sudden influx of 5000 AI catgirl research papers per day
😂😂😂
The more catgirl research papers, the better the odds that one of them will actually gives us catgirls, so… worth it?
I’m ready.
Note that Terrence Tao made his three year estimate in 2023. (One quote from him: “I expect, say, 2026-level AI, when used properly, will be a trustworthy co-author in mathematical research, and in many other fields as well.”
3 years sound like a long enough gravy train 😂
*I* *would* *like* *to* *see* *a* *video* *about* *the* *massive* *LLM* *benchmark* *scam.*
Read: “Alice in Wonderland: Simple Tasks Showing Complete Reasoning Breakdown in State-Of-the-Art Large Language Models”
I’m sure “The nutritional value of glue on pizza” will be a banger.
Next we need an automated “2 minute papers AI” channel to report about these wonderful AI generated papers.
Bro, it already is that. Did you not notice? This channel is AI.
Em vez de apresentar um artigo em 2 minutos, vão escrever um
Gamer here. Have you ever played a game that has some kind of progress, for example minecraft or factorio or other building games? When you reach the state where you have everything it starts being boring and you will tend to restart the game from the beginning. I think this could happen to humans as well if we eventually automate everything and don’t find some purpose in life.
We always have war with each other.
Lol all the rich people do everything they can to avoid paying taxes. What make you think they’re gonna share it with you
Video games are DESIGNED to give you everything eventually. What about the NPC that perished in a ditch somewhere
Job aren’t a goal, but a tool to a goal, if jobs are automated and we as humans start getting a Basic income for free, we could all focus on our own goals and dreams..
That’s already happening, with outrage culture and cancel culture raging about all sorts of bs 😂
Actually we have a better way of doing “papers” and “research” in the gamer world exactly like Factorio and Rimworld work. With AI we can now produce same things researchers produce in “virtual piles” in our game worlds and then have those piles grow with new “reesearch” outputting results and build on top of it in the same loop as Factorio is basically done. When done correctly these piles would never get boring, because there would be always something new to research, but not a fake-game technology, a real technology, the one stupid obsolete boomers are gatekeeping intelligent gamers away from, because then it would be actually FUN.
AI editing it’s own code…. Nothing will ever go wrong with that.
“What a time to be alive” is what will be written on our graves
😂